INTRODUCTION
A brief
History of The Fuel Subsidy Palaver In
Nigeria

The fuel subsidy quagmire first surfaced
in the late 80’s during the Ibrahim Babangida regime, when the then military
head of state increased the fuel pump price by more than 200%(from 23 kobo per litre
to 70 kobo per litre), amid protests. The reason was tied to the devaluation of
the naira, which made the domestic price of fuel unrealistic and a huge burden
to the federal government. And since then, we have had seven additional
increases( from Ernest Shonekon’s administration to
Olusegun Obasanjo’s era), with intermittent plunging of the price in between, leading to the present
price of 65 Naira
/Litre.

With the
government’s present position, it
appears we are about to tour a familiar route. The government’s position is
that the country cannot afford to live like this ; using
its monies to carter for fuel price differences,
that eventually goes to the pockets of selected few, while developmental
projects are allowed to suffer. But this seemingly logical explanation appears
not good enough to a large number of Nigerians; partly because most see it as
another governmental tool to increase poverty level and partly because most
citizen do not trust the government.
These are
two critical aspects that the writer identifies to be the major hurdle the
government faces in its quest to garner
support for its intention. And these the writer has put into consideration in the outlined strategies that would follow
next.
STRATEGIES AND THE
ROAD MAP
Since the intention of this strategy
is to reach out to the highest number of
Nigerians, the writer has deliberately
design a blueprint that carters for
every single Nigerian irrespective of their age, educational
qualification, or their skills. A schematic representation of the strategy (ICAN!),is presented below. Please see FIGURE 1
I=INDUSTRY
DEV.
C=CITIZEN
DEV.
A=AGRICULTURAL DEV.
N=NATIONAL DEV.
Firstly, the government should set up
modalities for the creation of the Subsidy Recovery Fund, SRF, where all monies
that would have been used to subsidise the fuel pump price would be kept. The
Fund would be managed by seven trust-worthy Nigerians; one each from the
country’s six Geo-political zones; The seventh person who would served as the
Chairman would be appointed by the presidency; he/she could be from any part of
the country.
The
terms of reference of the SRF, as representation in figure1 above, would be to
deliver the three key objectives below:
Ø Industry
Development
Ø Citizens
Development
Ø Agricultural
Development
INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT
Industry here refers to the oil and gas
industry. Since this is the industry that would provide the initial set-up fund and
subsequently provide a large percentage of the Fund’s operational costs, it is important
that it has a strong footing. The development would take the following shape,
place in order of priority:
ü Build full capacity operational Refineries: The writer deliberately recommend that
refineries be built and not upgrading or embarking on a turn- around
maintenance of the existing ones, because the latter has never done the nation
any good.
This of
course is not expected to be achieved in the first 3 or 5 years of SRF, but the Fund should see it as a top
priority project.
ü Holistic upgrade and maintenance of Transport & Storage
facilities,
such as pipelines and Depots.
These two, would be serving the dual purpose
of positioning the sector to return the
country back to its oil refining statues, and most importantly create jobs and
hence increase the citizen’s ability to pay for the new price
of fuel.
CITIZEN
DEVELOPMENT
What better way to ensure that new and
existing infrastructures don’t decay, other than to train and develop the users.
Development here would mean:
ü Educational Scholarship Grant offer to Nigerians from the
primary to the tertiary level.
ü Build Capacity development Centres(one for
each Geo-political zone) that would become Centres of Excellence, and that
would serve:
i)
As a library and
information centre regarding activities of the Fund, major developments in the
sector, and general information about the country. This would bridge the
information gap that usually exists between the government and its citizens,
and between players and non-players in the sector. And thus reduce the lack of
trust most citizens have for the government.
ii)
As a medium to make known the opportunities available in the
sector, particularly for SME’s run by Nigerians; from the craftsmen to
artisans.
iii)
As a skill training centre for Nigerians gifted in craftsmanship
that are relevant for the development of the sector. These would ultimately
increase the Entrepreneurial ability and Employability of Nigerians.
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
Majority of Nigerians living the rural areas are
farmers. This significant number of citizens can be empowered to bring about
National development by:
ü Providing
them with adequate Farm machineries & techniques of modern farming.
ü Providing
them with adequate processing & storage facilities.
CONCLUSION
Political will of the government is
imperative here to deliver these. Whilst the present government is preaching
the gospel of transformation, I dare to believe that if the government is
willing, subsidy removal would transform into one of the best decisions ever
taking by any Nigerian government.

Figure 1: Strategy For
Subsidy –Powered Development
A blueprint that is so powerful.I hope they read this!
ReplyDelete